From owner-freebsd-hackers Sat Mar 11 10:46:33 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from haldjas.folklore.ee (Haldjas.folklore.ee [193.40.6.121]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11DE537BC85 for ; Sat, 11 Mar 2000 10:46:14 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from narvi@haldjas.folklore.ee) Received: from localhost (narvi@localhost) by haldjas.folklore.ee (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id UAA73098; Sat, 11 Mar 2000 20:45:59 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from narvi@haldjas.folklore.ee) Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2000 20:45:59 +0200 (EET) From: Narvi To: Marco van de Voort Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Is FreeBSD dead ? In-Reply-To: <20000311181601.BEFFD2E804@hermes.tue.nl> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sat, 11 Mar 2000, Marco van de Voort wrote: > > > Then, what are the benefits for both parties ? > > > > > > For the FreeBSD project : > > > - many more supported platforms (Sparc, PowerPC, Arm ?) > > Merced? ......... > > > definately. > > I'm not sure if that is a good thing if it is pursued by the core team, > at least not for impopular or older targets. > Which targets would these be? ARM? Note that for the code - when it is available for integration - needs to be actually integrated by somebody, not to mention the userland, maintenance, etc. > > Marco van de Voort (MarcoV@Stack.nl) > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message