From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Jan 27 16:26:02 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10FA716A4CE
	for <current@freebsd.org>; Tue, 27 Jan 2004 16:26:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from harmony.village.org (rover.bsdimp.com [204.144.255.66])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89A0F43D45
	for <current@freebsd.org>; Tue, 27 Jan 2004 16:25:44 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com)
Received: from localhost (warner@rover2.village.org [10.0.0.1])
	by harmony.village.org (8.12.10/8.12.9) with ESMTP id i0S0PSET000252;
	Tue, 27 Jan 2004 17:25:28 -0700 (MST)
	(envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com)
Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2004 17:25:22 -0700 (MST)
Message-Id: <20040127.172522.81091103.imp@bsdimp.com>
To: des@des.no
From: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com>
In-Reply-To: <xzpvfmx5wya.fsf@dwp.des.no>
References: <xzpvfmx5wya.fsf@dwp.des.no>
X-Mailer: Mew version 3.3 on Emacs 21.3 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
cc: current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: devctl junk
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2004 00:26:02 -0000

In message: <xzpvfmx5wya.fsf@dwp.des.no>
            des@des.no (Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav) writes:
: What exactly is the point with all these "? at on foo0"?  They're no
: use to anyone, so why bother passing them out?

They are unknown devices.  Maybe they should be done differently, but
all device requests go out.

Warner