Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 21:33:47 -0700 From: Rich Hampton <rich@hamptonhouse.org> To: freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: syscons on U10 /w Creator Message-ID: <4006182B.7090400@hamptonhouse.org> In-Reply-To: <20040115042349.GA55653@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <4005FFC9.20308@hamptonhouse.org> <20040115031013.GA52532@xor.obsecurity.org> <400613C4.1090105@hamptonhouse.org> <20040115042349.GA55653@xor.obsecurity.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Kris Kennaway wrote: >On Wed, Jan 14, 2004 at 09:15:00PM -0700, Rich Hampton wrote: > > > >>Of course, I didn't think that had anything to do with it but when the >>order was exactly as above, the compile finished without error. So >>then, I went back to the original order and recompiled again and it >>finished without error. I don't know what's going on at this point. I >>think I had the uart before sc, or something to that effect. >> >> > >Hmm, that's pretty weird..I didn't think the order of entries mattered >in kernel configurations. > >Kris > I didn't think so either, and I still don't. Maybe it's just my week for weirdness....but then again, I screwed with it so many times this week I really can't remember exactly what I did. By the way, is puc really necessary here? I thought that had to do with i386 bios issues. Rich
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4006182B.7090400>