From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 14 20:33:57 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC94C16A4CE for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 20:33:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from hamptonhouse.org (cpe-66-87-223-101.co.sprintbbd.net [66.87.223.101]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55CBC43D5D for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 20:33:49 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from rich@hamptonhouse.org) Received: from hamptonhouse.org (penguin.hamptonhouse.org [192.168.0.71]) by hamptonhouse.org (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id i0F4XlCR028184 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 21:33:48 -0700 Message-ID: <4006182B.7090400@hamptonhouse.org> Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 21:33:47 -0700 From: Rich Hampton User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030630 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.org References: <4005FFC9.20308@hamptonhouse.org> <20040115031013.GA52532@xor.obsecurity.org> <400613C4.1090105@hamptonhouse.org> <20040115042349.GA55653@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <20040115042349.GA55653@xor.obsecurity.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: syscons on U10 /w Creator X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 04:33:58 -0000 Kris Kennaway wrote: >On Wed, Jan 14, 2004 at 09:15:00PM -0700, Rich Hampton wrote: > > > >>Of course, I didn't think that had anything to do with it but when the >>order was exactly as above, the compile finished without error. So >>then, I went back to the original order and recompiled again and it >>finished without error. I don't know what's going on at this point. I >>think I had the uart before sc, or something to that effect. >> >> > >Hmm, that's pretty weird..I didn't think the order of entries mattered >in kernel configurations. > >Kris > I didn't think so either, and I still don't. Maybe it's just my week for weirdness....but then again, I screwed with it so many times this week I really can't remember exactly what I did. By the way, is puc really necessary here? I thought that had to do with i386 bios issues. Rich