From owner-freebsd-hackers Sun Sep 20 21:20:06 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id VAA19602 for freebsd-hackers-outgoing; Sun, 20 Sep 1998 21:20:06 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from time.cdrom.com (time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id VAA19540 for ; Sun, 20 Sep 1998 21:19:43 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jkh@time.cdrom.com) Received: from time.cdrom.com (jkh@localhost.cdrom.com [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id VAA20663; Sun, 20 Sep 1998 21:19:28 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jkh@time.cdrom.com) To: Amancio Hasty cc: Mike Smith , "Pedro F. Giffuni" , hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: More on the Intel-UNIX standard In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 20 Sep 1998 20:00:18 PDT." <199809210300.UAA02353@rah.star-gate.com> Date: Sun, 20 Sep 1998 21:19:28 -0700 Message-ID: <20659.906351568@time.cdrom.com> From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > Fascinating, another way is to ask someone in your "core" group to > see if they are interested in taken on the task. Blah, give me some credit. I happen to know that everyone in core has work up to their eyeballs (and a good deal more than that in some cases) or I wouldn't have made my somewhat sardonic comment in the first place. > David Greeman comes to mind and probably in his case is a matter of David Greenman also comes to mind as one of the people who have more work than they know what to do with, and it's not just a matter of balancing priorities, it's a matter of not having 48 hours in a day. :) You'll have to do better than that, I'm afraid. I was sort of hoping that YOU might volunteer, in fact, since you're the one who brought it up in the first place. :-) - Jordan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message