From owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 21 15:40:12 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F5EA16A41F for ; Wed, 21 Sep 2005 15:40:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEFC943D45 for ; Wed, 21 Sep 2005 15:40:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j8LFeBYX035963 for ; Wed, 21 Sep 2005 15:40:11 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.3/8.13.1/Submit) id j8LFeBLi035962; Wed, 21 Sep 2005 15:40:11 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2005 15:40:11 GMT Message-Id: <200509211540.j8LFeBLi035962@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org From: Dan Lukes Cc: Subject: Re: bin/71653: [PATCH] usr.sbin/asf may use uninialised variables X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Dan Lukes List-Id: Bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2005 15:40:12 -0000 The following reply was made to PR bin/71653; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Dan Lukes To: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org Cc: linimon@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: bin/71653: [PATCH] usr.sbin/asf may use uninialised variables Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2005 17:38:41 +0200 Thank you for reviewing and commiting the patch. I see no notice about MFC. Is there a reason not to MFC the changes into 6.x branch (after re@ approval, of course) ? Or all future 6.?-RELEASES remain vulnerable to errors ? Dan