Date: Thu, 4 Jun 1998 18:22:10 -0600 From: Nate Williams <nate@mt.sri.com> To: dyson@FreeBSD.ORG Cc: mike@smith.net.au (Mike Smith), nate@mt.sri.com, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: kernfs/procfs questions... Message-ID: <199806050022.SAA05903@mt.sri.com> In-Reply-To: <199806050001.TAA00828@dyson.iquest.net> References: <199806042232.PAA02556@dingo.cdrom.com> <199806050001.TAA00828@dyson.iquest.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > > Do I have permission to start removing sysctl's that aren't > > > documented/used? > > > > I would be more inclined to suggest an evenhanded review; if you can't > > obtain documentation on one, then hash it out with UNDOCUMENTED_SYSCTLS > > and wait for someone to complain. Silence would sound like acceptance > > to me. > > > Nope, let's not create more work for the people really working on FreeBSD > than the armchair quarterbacks like Nate. If you aren't willing to document them, then it's not FreeBSD. It's JohnBSD, since John is the only person who makes use of them. FreeBSD is for everyone, not just John. Don't waste everyone's time trying to wade through stuff that has no relevance in their kernel. Nate To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199806050022.SAA05903>