From owner-freebsd-current Fri May 15 22:52:09 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id WAA05259 for freebsd-current-outgoing; Fri, 15 May 1998 22:52:09 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from majesticnet.com (host14.majestic.sysci.org [205.227.182.79]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id WAA05254 for ; Fri, 15 May 1998 22:52:08 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from ian@majesticnet.com) From: ian@majesticnet.com Received: (qmail 29412 invoked by uid 509); 16 May 1998 05:47:09 -0000 Date: Fri, 15 May 1998 22:47:09 -0700 (PDT) To: Amancio Hasty cc: Brian Somers , Julian Elischer , Open Systems Networking , Brian Feldman , freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: SoftUpdates stable?? In-Reply-To: <199805160127.SAA09947@rah.star-gate.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Similar situation here with regards to stability. Only I am running an over clocked PII@300, X with a Millenium2, using NFS as a client and actively serving 2-5 machines via samba. That and 'make -j8 buildworld' to keep the machine busy. Keep up the good work Julian! Ian Oh, I cvsup'd 2 days ago... > Puff, Puff, I am really trying to crash the system with softupdates > and my system refuses to crash 8) I did a make world and a rebuilt > the kernel about 2 days ago. > > I am not using NFS and my test box is UP P133. > > Cheers, > Amancio > P.S.: I am also running X -- S3 968 with 4MB of VRAM. > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message