From owner-freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Tue May 28 17:48:50 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8003515A6E0B for ; Tue, 28 May 2019 17:48:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cse.cem@gmail.com) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF7138A7E7 for ; Tue, 28 May 2019 17:48:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cse.cem@gmail.com) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 8FA6215A6E0A; Tue, 28 May 2019 17:48:49 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: arch@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69C4C15A6E09 for ; Tue, 28 May 2019 17:48:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cse.cem@gmail.com) Received: from mail-it1-f178.google.com (mail-it1-f178.google.com [209.85.166.178]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 744958A7E6 for ; Tue, 28 May 2019 17:48:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cse.cem@gmail.com) Received: by mail-it1-f178.google.com with SMTP id g24so5787985iti.5 for ; Tue, 28 May 2019 10:48:48 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:reply-to:from:date:message-id :subject:to; bh=c724+u1e440yriiFdzen/csI4q1rLfEQAvXzCVP4NPs=; b=lirdnYCCXCXLAX9T1YL0IanWwKwuhOMo0W4qvnh+6NIcrUKUHqISY5Pdxt8yaOydz0 8uurSC8bHWvYPCZs13hSV3X6zsAdpvrjxpFI7mWsbhMeZuDcMeDMds1zxXxB5y+Meh5o orHcJ1NSR0bDnM+h2VXFuCldCnwkxamzY2AFwinpjmYi6HZeaz4+BhBu7h44zdMGnyIF BhBNXSO86QhXMsDM9bky3bJloA1AgZteN6x7abkkyXGpX/c3oCstLehh6DKdRJ9ARZEA zCkcDLSI9bUs1ORJsc0HA7NwALfVLsnhZzYELV5LihoMlRXFnHW2IPsUJoT483mtWtlu v2/A== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUTpEZce6CD3uafOANPwdkAqRlxrKtD/0s5kHjD3hdOODySyf+W qHeT50RShdgzgrnLTSjx8keiorBd X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwJwgvWIgbfh0BPAbWpHseQFMuzoO3A/LcmZUgMItCKYq2aT8QdNcdRA8E2TIgKJjojCJwUyw== X-Received: by 2002:a02:3b55:: with SMTP id i21mr82204195jaf.128.1559065215491; Tue, 28 May 2019 10:40:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-it1-f179.google.com (mail-it1-f179.google.com. [209.85.166.179]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id p11sm1370477itc.2.2019.05.28.10.40.15 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 28 May 2019 10:40:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-it1-f179.google.com with SMTP id e184so5297236ite.1 for ; Tue, 28 May 2019 10:40:15 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 2002:a24:9ac7:: with SMTP id l190mr953965ite.100.1559065215052; Tue, 28 May 2019 10:40:15 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Reply-To: cem@freebsd.org From: Conrad Meyer Date: Tue, 28 May 2019 10:40:04 -0700 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: style.9 RFC: Permit eliding blank lines in small functions To: "freebsd-arch@freebsd.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 744958A7E6 X-Spamd-Bar: ----- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of csecem@gmail.com designates 209.85.166.178 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=csecem@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-5.53 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; HAS_REPLYTO(0.00)[cem@freebsd.org]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:209.85.128.0/17]; REPLYTO_ADDR_EQ_FROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[cached: alt3.gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.99)[-0.985,0]; FORGED_SENDER(0.30)[cem@freebsd.org,csecem@gmail.com]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:209.85.128.0/17, country:US]; TAGGED_FROM(0.00)[]; TO_DOM_EQ_FROM_DOM(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[cem@freebsd.org,csecem@gmail.com]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[arch@freebsd.org]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[freebsd.org]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; IP_SCORE(-2.53)[ip: (-6.93), ipnet: 209.85.128.0/17(-3.38), asn: 15169(-2.29), country: US(-0.06)]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[178.166.85.209.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 May 2019 17:48:50 -0000 Hi, I have proposed a small change to style.9 here: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D20448 I believe this has been generally permitted in practice and the change is mostly to codify existing unwritten standards, rather than to change them. The goal of this thread is to determine if we do have general consensus for the concept. Thanks, Conrad P.S., please try to avoid the obvious bikeshed trap about the number 4.