From owner-freebsd-current Sat Sep 23 21:39:17 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from nagual.pp.ru (pobrecita.freebsd.ru [194.87.13.42]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C4D937B424 for ; Sat, 23 Sep 2000 21:39:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from ache@localhost) by nagual.pp.ru (8.11.0/8.11.0) id e8O4YfU50039; Sun, 24 Sep 2000 08:34:41 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from ache) Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2000 08:34:40 +0400 From: "Andrey A. Chernov" To: Garrett Wollman Cc: Marcel Moolenaar , current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: mtree again Message-ID: <20000924083440.A49999@nagual.pp.ru> References: <20000915033837.A564@nagual.pp.ru> <200009142341.RAA00700@harmony.village.org> <20000915043925.A83698@nagual.pp.ru> <39CD3698.D2EF0663@cup.hp.com> <200009240144.VAA34295@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <200009240144.VAA34295@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu>; from wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu on Sat, Sep 23, 2000 at 09:44:21PM -0400 Organization: Biomechanoid Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sat, Sep 23, 2000 at 09:44:21PM -0400, Garrett Wollman wrote: > < said: > > > Is their any harm in just keeping the -P flag as a no-op and optionally > > remove it at some later time (for backward compatibility)? > > We should try to be consistent with POSIX.1-200x as much as possible. What POSIX.1-200x says about this thing? I don't have this book in hand. -- Andrey A. Chernov http://ache.pp.ru/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message