Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 3 Nov 2000 16:33:37 -0800 (PST)
From:      Roger Marquis <marquis@roble.com>
To:        hackers@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: FreeBSD in good standing in netcraft survey
Message-ID:  <Pine.BSF.4.21.0011031633001.61476-100000@roble.com>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Greg Black <gjb@gbch.net> wrote:
>I certainly am not impressed by uptimes over about 100 days.
>They show that the site does not care about keeping current.

In theory perhaps, not in reality.  What uptime does tend to indicate
is a well managed system.  "Keeping current" is only really important
to developers.  To your average system administrator the less time
spent "keeping current" the better.  If you ever have to maintain
a lights-out datacenter perhaps you'll see why.

One nice thing about Sun's Solaris is its patch/package subsystem.
It makes incremental upgrades very easy to apply.  Sun also supports
OS revisions going back several years.  This is the right way to
keep current, not by reinstalling or cvsupping and the relatively
_large_risk_ of downtime and/or software incompatibilities.

We average two years between Solaris OS upgrades.  FreeBSD doesn't
come close to that.  Solaris' reliable method of incremental patching
saves hours of planning, downtime and dollars over an equivalent
FreeBSD site.  This is one of the reasons why you don't see Sun's
market share slipping in production environments.

FreeBSD is, to an unfortunate degree, designed by and for developers
with far too little input and direction from the people who manage
production environments.  This is one of the things that makes
FreeBSD a great development platform and one of the reasons it
remains cutting-edge.  This is all great if you're a developer, as
99% of the crowd at the recent BSDcon seemed to be, but it's not
necessarily so great when you're an admin.

It seems unlikely we'll ever see FreeBSD's hard working developer
community spending a lot of time on things like backwards compatibility,
interoperability, and ease of management.  This is too bad because
these issues handicap FreeBSD vis-a-vis the Microsoft's and Sun's
out there.  I think it's a bad long term strategy but only time
will tell for sure.

-- 
Roger Marquis
Roble Systems Consulting
http://www.roble.com/



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0011031633001.61476-100000>