From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 22 14:56:12 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F7A716A468 for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 14:56:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mi+mill@aldan.algebra.com) Received: from mail5.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail5.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.7]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78E9613C4D1 for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 14:56:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mi+mill@aldan.algebra.com) Received: (qmail 9069 invoked from network); 22 Jan 2008 14:29:31 -0000 Received: from aldan.algebra.com (HELO aldan-mlp) ([216.254.65.224]) (envelope-sender ) by mail5.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 22 Jan 2008 14:29:31 -0000 From: Mikhail Teterin To: Edwin Groothuis Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 09:29:25 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.1 References: <200801201628.m0KGSlq6037319@repoman.freebsd.org> <200801212057.33990@aldan> <20080122022122.GA37321@k7.mavetju> In-Reply-To: <20080122022122.GA37321@k7.mavetju> Organization: Virtual Estates, Inc. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="koi8-u" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200801220929.29201.mi+mill@aldan.algebra.com> Cc: cvs-ports@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org, Mikhail Teterin , ports-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/net/ekiga pkg-plist X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 14:56:12 -0000 =D0=CF=CE=C5=C4=A6=CC=CF=CB 21 =D3=A6=DE=C5=CE=D8 2008 09:21 =D0=CF, Edwin = Groothuis =F7=C9 =CE=C1=D0=C9=D3=C1=CC=C9: > > The new package NEVER built because of the problem, that was just fixed. > > It's more to differentiate between working and non-working versions. They are both working versions. If you need to make a distinction, you can= =20 look at the $FreeBSD$-string. Bumping up the PORTREVISION would trigger an utterly useless rebuild on=20 thousands (millions?) of end-user computers and should not be performed=20 lightly. Yours, -mi