From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 18 07:29:39 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 617EA410; Tue, 18 Dec 2012 07:29:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [188.252.31.196]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE8E38FC16; Tue, 18 Dec 2012 07:29:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id qBI7TXPn016542; Tue, 18 Dec 2012 08:29:34 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) with ESMTP id qBI7TXVF016539; Tue, 18 Dec 2012 08:29:33 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2012 08:29:33 +0100 (CET) From: Wojciech Puchar To: Zaphod Beeblebrox Subject: Re: iSCSI vs. SMB with ZFS. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <1886761249.1455682.1355777126858.JavaMail.root@erie.cs.uoguelph.ca> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: MULTIPART/MIXED; BOUNDARY="2456600518-72300972-1355815773=:16538" X-Greylist: Sender passed SPF test, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [127.0.0.1]); Tue, 18 Dec 2012 08:29:34 +0100 (CET) Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, Rick Macklem , Ivan Voras X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2012 07:29:39 -0000 This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. --2456600518-72300972-1355815773=:16538 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT you cannot compare file serving and block device serving. On Mon, 17 Dec 2012, Zaphod Beeblebrox wrote: > Does windows 7 support nfs v4, then?  Is it expected (ie: is it worthwhile trying) that nfsv4 would perform at a similar speed to > iSCSI?  It would seem that this at least requires active directory (or this user name mapping ... which I remember being hard). > > > --2456600518-72300972-1355815773=:16538--