From owner-freebsd-questions  Fri Jul 18 10:19:13 1997
Return-Path: <owner-questions>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id KAA04082
          for questions-outgoing; Fri, 18 Jul 1997 10:19:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from super-g.inch.com (super-g.com [207.240.140.161])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id KAA04069
          for <questions@freebsd.org>; Fri, 18 Jul 1997 10:19:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (spork@localhost)
	by super-g.inch.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id NAA25519
	for <questions@freebsd.org>; Fri, 18 Jul 1997 13:40:57 GMT
Date: Fri, 18 Jul 1997 13:40:57 +0000 (GMT)
From: spork <spork@super-g.com>
X-Sender: spork@super-g.inch.com
To: questions@freebsd.org
Subject: More Intel 10/100
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.95q.970718133755.25471A-100000@super-g.inch.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-questions@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

I'd seen some traffic in the archives about the "unsupported PHY, type =
7" messages with the Intel card, and I see that after I booted a
2.2-stable kernel these went away:

Jul 17 06:08:19 test /kernel.GENERIC: fxp0: Ethernet address
00:a0:c9:5c:e5:84
Jul 17 06:08:21 test /kernel.GENERIC: fxp0: warning: unsupported PHY, type
= 7, addr = 1
Jul 17 06:35:21 test /kernel: fxp0 <Intel EtherExpress Pro 10/100B
Ethernet> rev 2 int a irq 10 on pci0:11
Jul 17 06:35:21 test /kernel: fxp0: Ethernet address 00:a0:c9:5c:e5:84

So are all the various Intel "fxp" cards supported, regardless of which
chip is used?  I'm just curious, as it seems like at some point the Intel
won out over the Digital as the "preffered" 10/100 card for FBSD.  We're
dying to standardize on one card througout our shop...

TIA,

Charles