From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 25 22:40:43 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3BE65FE for ; Thu, 25 Oct 2012 22:40:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yanegomi@gmail.com) Received: from mail-la0-f54.google.com (mail-la0-f54.google.com [209.85.215.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 577A68FC14 for ; Thu, 25 Oct 2012 22:40:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-la0-f54.google.com with SMTP id e12so2641105lag.13 for ; Thu, 25 Oct 2012 15:40:42 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=5YCktfFlaGbNYG0SELSQB2Hprrmpgs0Tz1gkkB2jR4k=; b=aSN59l/u1LbIB0l81ywleu1fx468KeuvlbSyU5TeeeMA33MKUoIDsucV78gwMqMpch ccWbc4U/8drpSgdOV9iEchNqL/d0xF5hYNRzqQ6MoPirdlHsJTy0oBHyVR/fl4oLZGoY 3tmiR/7ZZOPG4h+Hhrx8hT1xzULnZaLSX6Zswz3qECT07srOuSjmmx0SCjQhF+iv8vYD dpcSWZIRRNzR7GSTlCX+FvYO5JbLgK+mbvmDOSfgb9XOpJYxJGfH7TOCVxLKRt98pUOE W77daq6hYq+yfk5WJFih93i1jSCR4APLRM664kjKmVPOiA2fEgrdbtmGZC4sB37j4139 61aQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.112.46.7 with SMTP id r7mr8330780lbm.73.1351204842098; Thu, 25 Oct 2012 15:40:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.112.43.232 with HTTP; Thu, 25 Oct 2012 15:40:42 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <5089BE49.6090804@mail.lifanov.com> References: <5089B4D9.9070601@mail.lifanov.com> <5089BE49.6090804@mail.lifanov.com> Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2012 15:40:42 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: ums stopped autoloading between 242082 and 242090 From: Garrett Cooper To: Nikolai Lifanov Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2012 22:40:44 -0000 On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 3:33 PM, Nikolai Lifanov wrote: ... > HEAD, sorry No worries. Nothing coming to mind in the svn commits immediately, so it might be a complex interaction issue. I would see if you could individually roll back commits until you find the problem child. It could also be accidental fallout from the recent ACPI update... -Garrett