Date: Fri, 13 Oct 1995 11:08:52 -0700 (MST) From: Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org> To: julian@ref.tfs.com (Julian Elischer) Cc: jkh@time.cdrom.com, terry@lambert.org, jhay@mikom.csir.co.za, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: IPX now available Message-ID: <199510131808.LAA17873@phaeton.artisoft.com> In-Reply-To: <199510130456.VAA06646@ref.tfs.com> from "Julian Elischer" at Oct 12, 95 09:56:04 pm
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > > The gist of this is that he wants to work on putting simple linker code > > > into the kernel, and I very much agree with him. > > > > Assuming that you and the anti-bloatists can work this out, this and > > everything following it certainly sounds reasonable to me. > > > > dev_add_char (just dev_add?) > > dev_remove_char (just dev_remove?) > devfs already has dev_add() and dev_link() > these are called by the driver to make a new device in devfs > or to make a new 'link' to an existing device in devfs. > dev_remove is there too but not really implimented.. > maybe I should change the names to devfs_add et al. I think it is reasonable to require a common prefix on all functions exported by a conceptually seperate module. Terry Lambert terry@lambert.org --- Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present or previous employers.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199510131808.LAA17873>