From owner-freebsd-net  Thu Nov  5 05:27:18 1998
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG>
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id FAA11037
          for freebsd-net-outgoing; Thu, 5 Nov 1998 05:27:18 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG)
Received: from inner.net (avarice.inner.net [199.33.248.2])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id FAA11025
          for <freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG>; Thu, 5 Nov 1998 05:27:16 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from cmetz@inner.net)
Received: from inner.net (cmetz.cstone.net [205.197.102.217])
	by inner.net (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id NAA21643;
	Thu, 5 Nov 1998 13:12:10 GMT
Message-Id: <199811051312.NAA21643@inner.net>
To: enkhyl@hayseed.net
cc: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>, freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: ipsec (VPN) for -current ? (Re: VPN through encrypted IP tunnel for FreeBSD? ) 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 05 Nov 1998 01:21:00 PST."
             <Pine.BSF.4.05.9811050056500.317-100000@ender.sf.scient.com> 
X-Copyright: Copyright 1998, Craig Metz, All Rights Reserved.
X-Reposting: With explicit permission only
Date: Thu, 05 Nov 1998 03:26:37 -0500
From: Craig Metz <cmetz@inner.net>
Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

In message <Pine.BSF.4.05.9811050056500.317-100000@ender.sf.scient.com>, you wr
ite:
>IPsec is still an evolving standard, so I don't think there is a single
>implementation that's "finished", per se.

  The next release of NRL's IPv6+IPsec (due in order days) also supports
FreeBSD 3.0.

  All the implementations I know of have their strengths and their weaknesses.

									-Craig

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message