From owner-freebsd-ports Sat Aug 15 18:25:29 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id SAA15169 for freebsd-ports-outgoing; Sat, 15 Aug 1998 18:25:29 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from catastrophe.gelemna.ft-wayne.in.us (fw-line-137.fwi.com [209.84.172.142]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id SAA15164 for ; Sat, 15 Aug 1998 18:25:23 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from croyle@gelemna.ft-wayne.in.us) Received: from emerson.gelemna.ft-wayne.in.us (emerson.gelemna.ft-wayne.in.us [10.23.42.2]) by catastrophe.gelemna.ft-wayne.in.us (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id UAA07877; Sat, 15 Aug 1998 20:24:20 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from croyle@gelemna.ft-wayne.in.us) Received: (from croyle@localhost) by emerson.gelemna.ft-wayne.in.us (8.9.1/8.9.1) id UAA14941; Sat, 15 Aug 1998 20:24:19 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from croyle@gelemna.ft-wayne.in.us) To: ac199@hwcn.org, ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Status of p5- module work in the ports tree? References: <199808152251.SAA02270@istari.home.net> <19980816004758$57a2@catastrophe> Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.108) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII From: Don Croyle Date: 15 Aug 1998 20:24:18 -0500 Organization: Minimal at best In-Reply-To: Tim Vanderhoek's message of "Sat, 15 Aug 1998 20:38:46 -0400 (EDT)" Message-ID: <86r9yhyb0d.fsf@emerson.gelemna.ft-wayne.in.us> Lines: 22 X-Mailer: Gnus v5.6.36/XEmacs 20.4 - "Emerald" Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Tim Vanderhoek writes: > > If someone is working on this, I'll just fix my local tree and wait > > for the changes... > > Test (duh :-), and submit as one big PR. That's more likely to > catch someone's attention. I had considered doing this, at least for the modules I use, but given the lack of response to my PRs 7421(+update) and 7597-7599 it looked like it would be a wasted effort. Whether it's a matter of all the commiters getting busy at once or just post-2.2.7 release let-down, there have been a lot of ports-related PRs building up over the past few weeks. The p5-*'s are only the most glaring problem. If it's just a case of not enough people with the time to do the work, I'd be willing to help out. -- I've always wanted to be a dilettante, but I've never quite been ready to make the commitment. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message