From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 5 15:09:52 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D7176FFB for ; Wed, 5 Mar 2014 15:09:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ob0-x22f.google.com (mail-ob0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c01::22f]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9EECF3B4 for ; Wed, 5 Mar 2014 15:09:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ob0-f175.google.com with SMTP id uy5so1122343obc.34 for ; Wed, 05 Mar 2014 07:09:52 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=XSoFxzu8YHbvpSFth7WptDaWTtkrnd588u+V3aqpLKY=; b=0WPTwM4jaqibT/6Fl3JwZKoxQDOQpoMCyxcF7GF+5I5PLWhsrUxCvBPFV+gBqYxI3w tJ13dC5QF2zmBWdIWYrJw0rRVff1UvgY7LumJX9BNTh/eVOlzT6+IBm3tFwRqJax/3yE sAcCjNPveLek+vEozbY9JauJCiP42q9I8KCW/x9KFWP1bK7bGYbHsLrFwyzbNZPDet7i Vm8bDhOmcpmrYnxNbvkp9I/KDJ9y0R+SrvrI2fsvENekSzIxXPNVz+yCaBb7ekkXJs0E BX7lqubRcS4UxhnqNVLZ8uqHhHApItp2dqYxq0D+8bq9c3zpf+RtfpRl9DhbUvX2j4b0 4eqg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.182.65.199 with SMTP id z7mr5021057obs.7.1394032192072; Wed, 05 Mar 2014 07:09:52 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.76.144.10 with HTTP; Wed, 5 Mar 2014 07:09:51 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2014 16:09:51 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: ipfw / routing issue on 9.2-RELEASE From: Andreas Nilsson To: Raimundo Santos Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.17 Cc: FreeBSD Net X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Mar 2014 15:09:52 -0000 Hello Raimundo On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 2:26 PM, Raimundo Santos wrote: > Hello, Andreas. > > If table(12) is empty, how will fwd know where to send the packets that > hits it? > My understanding is that the rule should not be triggered, as the "... from table(12)" will not match any packets. Other packets on the box that traverse the ruleset goes out just fine. > > Best regards, > Raimundo > > > >