From owner-freebsd-current Thu Jun 13 22:24:32 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mail-relay1.yahoo.com (mail-relay1.yahoo.com [216.145.48.34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF58237B426 for ; Thu, 13 Jun 2002 22:24:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from FreeBSD.org (12-234-90-219.client.attbi.com [12.234.90.219]) by mail-relay1.yahoo.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B40D28B5C5 for ; Thu, 13 Jun 2002 22:24:28 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <3D097E0C.DBB66DAD@FreeBSD.org> Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2002 22:24:28 -0700 From: Doug Barton Organization: Triborough Bridge & Tunnel Authority X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (X11; U; FreeBSD 4.5-RELEASE i386) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org Subject: "cost" of vidcontrol -m ? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=conf/39125 presents an interesting hypothesis, namely that vidcontrol -m ought to be enabled by default in usbd.conf. I tend to agree with that premise, but before I commit it I was curious as to what the "cost" of doing this would be. Specifically, I have a usb mouse, but I spend almost all my time in X, so when I need the copy/paste stuff in the console, I just run vidcontrol by hand. It would be more convenient to have it "just work," but I'd hate to screw over low resource users in the proces... Doug -- "We have known freedom's price. We have shown freedom's power. And in this great conflict, ... we will see freedom's victory." - George W. Bush, President of the United States State of the Union, January 28, 2002 Do YOU Yahoo!? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message