From owner-freebsd-current  Mon Jan  8 04:10:38 1996
Return-Path: owner-current
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id EAA04682
          for current-outgoing; Mon, 8 Jan 1996 04:10:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (time.cdrom.com [192.216.222.226])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id EAA04675
          for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>; Mon, 8 Jan 1996 04:10:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.6.12/8.6.9) with SMTP id EAA23579; Mon, 8 Jan 1996 04:01:20 -0800
To: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami)
cc: phk@critter.tfs.com, joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de,
        freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Current is looking more stable these days..? 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 08 Jan 1996 02:43:09 PST."
             <199601081043.CAA13701@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU> 
Date: Mon, 08 Jan 1996 04:01:20 -0800
Message-ID: <23576.821102480@time.cdrom.com>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
Sender: owner-current@freebsd.org
Precedence: bulk

> I think that's fine.  By the way, don't forget to let the ports and
> packages be fetched from ports-current and packages-current on the ftp
> site, without the "-current" users will get 2.1 versions.

No problem.

> I don't have time to rebuild all the packages right now (although many
> of them are already built over the last couple of weeks).

Not necessary - we're mostly just trying to test the base bits here
with the snapshots..  Once we get further along in 2.2's development
cycle, perhaps we can talk about updating ports! :)

					Jordan