From owner-freebsd-bugbusters@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 15 20:20:29 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-bugbusters@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEB4510656D0 for ; Sun, 15 Jan 2012 20:20:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from utisoft@gmail.com) Received: from mail-iy0-f182.google.com (mail-iy0-f182.google.com [209.85.210.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7A318FC0C for ; Sun, 15 Jan 2012 20:20:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iagz16 with SMTP id z16so3824228iag.13 for ; Sun, 15 Jan 2012 12:20:29 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=V9vRgEopgtE/tS+otDxW/FBvwjTolqI/7ZRcoB1aT0s=; b=uzupBkiq9GZsK0/yTjvAYfIYp32LDGrACb6jkMWOr1EhUhfYFFWqNVpENY6nvLKOAX fzSb3mbqLoThsemqb/RRg1HFWRf2yL7VtWtnOgXTmtkTKHsv/NXl4MPepE+z0GZgiSxR iVWzf+f1KPhSQ8IoWGqaxEQ3Jcc6tbyk7MO8s= Received: by 10.50.193.229 with SMTP id hr5mr10004345igc.15.1326658829267; Sun, 15 Jan 2012 12:20:29 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.207.7 with HTTP; Sun, 15 Jan 2012 12:19:58 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20120115011340.GA911@lonesome.com> References: <4F11E1BA.2010404@freebsd.org> <20120115011340.GA911@lonesome.com> From: Chris Rees Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2012 20:19:58 +0000 Message-ID: To: Mark Linimon Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: vwe@freebsd.org, freebsd-bugbusters@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Gnats port disappeared?? X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugbusters@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Coordination of the Problem Report handling effort." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2012 20:20:30 -0000 On 15 January 2012 01:13, Mark Linimon wrote: > On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 09:12:42PM +0100, vwe@freebsd.org wrote: >> So it's clearly not a mistake, but a portsmgr decision. > > Well, I decided not to fight the removal any more, even though it's > still part of our infrastructure. =A0(At least for the time being.) > fwiw, the effort to move our infrastructure from gnats3 to gnats would > produce little real gain for all the work that would have to be done. > > It can always be installed by force-checking out files via a datespec. > > I'm hoping now that some of the pointyhat-west tasks have been finished, > that I can go back to looking at The Next System soon. That's cool-- but my question still stands; would you like a patch to stop it choking on Fwd: emails sent to bug-followup? Chris