From owner-freebsd-hackers  Fri May 10 14:53: 3 2002
Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Received: from ns2.gnf.org (ns2.gnf.org [63.196.132.68])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BD8937B405
	for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Fri, 10 May 2002 14:53:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.gnf.org (smtp.gnf.org [172.25.11.11])
	by ns2.gnf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g4ALhLO05981
	for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Fri, 10 May 2002 14:43:21 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from gordont@gnf.org)
Received: by mail.gnf.org (Postfix, from userid 888)
	id 46B5211E511; Fri, 10 May 2002 14:53:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by mail.gnf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4589211A572
	for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Fri, 10 May 2002 14:53:00 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Fri, 10 May 2002 14:53:00 -0700 (PDT)
From: Gordon Tetlow <gordont@gnf.org>
To: hackers@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: nextboot loader diff
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0205090040130.558-200000@smtp.gnf.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0205101451260.27477-100000@smtp.gnf.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <freebsd-hackers.FreeBSD.ORG>
List-Archive: <http://docs.freebsd.org/mail/> (Web Archive)
List-Help: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=help> (List Instructions)
List-Subscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=subscribe%20freebsd-hackers>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=unsubscribe%20freebsd-hackers>
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

Is there anything that is wrong with the conceptual implementation of the
nextboot loader code that I've submitted? It definitely needs a code
cleanup on the forth side (which I'm not qualified to do), but if there
are no other objections, I'd really like to see this code committed.

-gordon


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message