Date: Thu, 13 May 2004 12:46:19 +0200 From: des@des.no (=?iso-8859-1?q?Dag-Erling_Sm=F8rgrav?=) To: Doug Rabson <dfr@nlsystems.com> Cc: dfr@freebsd.org Subject: Re: newbus flaw Message-ID: <xzpsme4bo5g.fsf@dwp.des.no> In-Reply-To: <200405130927.01034.dfr@nlsystems.com> (Doug Rabson's message of "Thu, 13 May 2004 09:27:01 %2B0100") References: <xzp4qqn6n9v.fsf@dwp.des.no> <20040512175351.GF601@funkthat.com> <xzp8yfxcrs7.fsf@dwp.des.no> <200405130927.01034.dfr@nlsystems.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Doug Rabson <dfr@nlsystems.com> writes: > When the old module unloaded, its driver will have detached from the=20 > device which it created. There is no reference to an old driver_t. Its=20 > perfectly safe for the new driver to use the old device. so why do you say I "shouldn't reset the old driver and desc"? DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@des.no
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xzpsme4bo5g.fsf>