Date: Tue, 31 Dec 1996 04:28:34 +0800 From: Peter Wemm <peter@spinner.DIALix.COM> To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com> Cc: joerg@freebsd.org, CVS-committers@freefall.freebsd.org, cvs-all@freefall.freebsd.org, cvs-lib@freefall.freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/lib/libc/net res_stubs.c Makefile.inc Message-ID: <199612302028.EAA25710@spinner.DIALix.COM> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 30 Dec 1996 12:12:29 PST." <15655.851976749@time.cdrom.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
"Jordan K. Hubbard" wrote: > > Anyway, the idea was that these files should go into 2.2 after testing in > > -current for a day or two... Perhaps this slip of fingers forced the > > issue. Joerg? Jordan? You want these backed out? (I've been using them > > in approximately this form for 8 weeks) Or wait and see if it causes > > problems first? > > I'm willing to leave them in there until/unless they cause problems. > We've still got a few weeks of testing ahead, so better now than later. :) > > Jordan Well, I'm certain (within the limits imposed my Murphy's law) that it cannot possibly *cause* problems. The issue is more one of "Can 2.2 run an arbitary resolver-using 3.0 binary, such as sendmail" and vice versa. If not, we need to find and add the missing aliases before it's shipped. The two are call interface compatable. Casual inspection of the early bind-8 resolver looks pretty much the same as the bind-4.9.5-P1 code that I just imported into -current, so providing we get this right, John Polstra might actually get his wish for a while. :-) But then, wait till the question of the bind-8 service switch comes up.. Now _that_ is going to be fun... Cheers, -Peter
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199612302028.EAA25710>