From owner-freebsd-ports Mon Aug 30 0:45: 9 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from nttdtec.co.jp (atom.nttdtec.co.jp [210.161.252.51]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1045015124; Mon, 30 Aug 1999 00:45:06 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from ryuichiro.imura@nttdtec.co.jp) Received: from mail0.nttdtec.co.jp by nttdtec.co.jp (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4) id QAA08032; Mon, 30 Aug 1999 16:44:36 +0900 Received: from imurar.nttdtec.co.jp ([192.168.16.99]) by mail0.nttdtec.co.jp (Lotus SMTP MTA v4.6.2 (693.3 8-11-1998)) with SMTP id 492567DD.002A1DEE; Mon, 30 Aug 1999 16:40:01 +0900 Message-ID: <006c01bef2bb$d7c26500$6310a8c0@imurar.nttdtec.co.jp> From: "=?iso-8859-1?B?iOSRuiCXs4jqmFk=?=" To: , Cc: "Steve Price" , "Chris Piazza" , "FreeBSD Ports" Subject: RE: USE_QT2 in bsd.port.mk Date: Mon, 30 Aug 1999 16:47:00 +0900 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="MimeMultipartBoundary" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.2106.4 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.2106.4 Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org --MimeMultipartBoundary Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > * so, next Qt-2.0.2, Qt-2.0.3... shuld be compatible, I think. > * Qt renames but directory name remains, it seems strange, isn't it? > * I think qt20 is better. > >Hmm. I distinctly remembering having to create qt141 and then qt142 >because they were not quite compatible to qt140. > >Anyway, I made a copy to qt201 for now. If the next version is >compatible, we can always call that one qt20 and erase qt201. > > * R. Imura > >Satoshi OK. No problem. ----- R. Imura --MimeMultipartBoundary-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message