From owner-freebsd-current Tue Sep 15 21:49:57 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id VAA28718 for freebsd-current-outgoing; Tue, 15 Sep 1998 21:49:57 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from seera.nttlabs.com (seera.nttlabs.com [204.162.36.81]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id VAA28712; Tue, 15 Sep 1998 21:49:55 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gene@nttlabs.com) Received: from localhost (gene@localhost) by seera.nttlabs.com (8.8.8/8.8.7) with SMTP id VAA06112; Tue, 15 Sep 1998 21:49:37 -0700 (PDT) X-Authentication-Warning: seera.nttlabs.com: gene owned process doing -bs Date: Tue, 15 Sep 1998 21:49:37 -0700 (PDT) From: "Eugene M. Kim" To: Satoshi Asami cc: FreeBSD-current Mailing List Subject: libX11.so version in bsd.port.mk Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hello, According to the bump-up-the-version rule, libX11 in my XFree86 port now has the version of 7. Unfortunately bsd.port.mk expects libX11.so.6 if USE_XLIB is defined (see around line 530 in bsd.port.mk) and this renders all X11 ports unusable with the new XFree86 port. Shall I go back to libX11.so.6? I'm confused. Thanks, Eugene PS. In fact I don't see a reason to bump up the shlib versions in ports... Could you perhaps explain why we should do it? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message