From owner-freebsd-hackers Fri May 17 13:28:23 1996 Return-Path: owner-hackers Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id NAA16329 for hackers-outgoing; Fri, 17 May 1996 13:28:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from phaeton.artisoft.com (phaeton.Artisoft.COM [198.17.250.211]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id NAA16322 for ; Fri, 17 May 1996 13:28:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from terry@localhost) by phaeton.artisoft.com (8.6.11/8.6.9) id NAA20599; Fri, 17 May 1996 13:23:46 -0700 From: Terry Lambert Message-Id: <199605172023.NAA20599@phaeton.artisoft.com> Subject: Re: Re(2): Standard Shipping Containers - A Proposal for Distributing FreeBSD To: nate@sri.MT.net (Nate Williams) Date: Fri, 17 May 1996 13:23:46 -0700 (MST) Cc: rkw@dataplex.net, hackers@freebsd.org, nate@sri.MT.net In-Reply-To: <199605170419.WAA25739@rocky.sri.MT.net> from "Nate Williams" at May 16, 96 10:19:37 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > > I hope there is somebody out there who cares about the difficulties of the > > "average joe" and doesn't simply brush off those problems because they are a > > member of the elite class who get to play by their own rules. > > Cheap shot. I'm not 'elite' class, but what I hear you arguing for is > something that the 'members of the elite class' get to implement, which > means more work. Since the current system already works and doesn't > require any more work for me, I'm bane to consider anything that makes > my life more difficult. I think he is referring to commit priviledges. Terry Lambert terry@lambert.org --- Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present or previous employers.