From owner-freebsd-net  Tue May 30 19:51:44 2000
Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Received: from coconut.itojun.org (coconut.itojun.org [210.160.95.97])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5507F37BE33
	for <freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG>; Tue, 30 May 2000 19:51:40 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from itojun@itojun.org)
Received: from kiwi.itojun.org (localhost.itojun.org [127.0.0.1])
	by coconut.itojun.org (8.9.3+3.2W/3.7W) with ESMTP id LAA05681;
	Wed, 31 May 2000 11:51:35 +0900 (JST)
To: Archie Cobbs <archie@whistle.com>
Cc: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG
In-reply-to: archie's message of Tue, 30 May 2000 18:19:27 MST.
      <200005310119.SAA86718@bubba.whistle.com>
X-Template-Reply-To: itojun@itojun.org
X-Template-Return-Receipt-To: itojun@itojun.org
X-PGP-Fingerprint: F8 24 B4 2C 8C 98 57 FD  90 5F B4 60 79 54 16 E2
Subject: Re: BPF fix to if_loop.c
From: itojun@iijlab.net
Date: Wed, 31 May 2000 11:51:35 +0900
Message-ID: <5679.959741495@coconut.itojun.org>
Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

>The commit comment to revision 1.33 of if_loop.c may be slightly
>enlightening..
>  http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/sys/net/if_loop.c
>For an example of the resulting cleanup, see:
>  http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/sys/net/if_ethersubr.c.diff?r1=1.48&r2=1.49
>Maybe the caller of if_simloop() should be responsible for the BPF part..

	that is my understanding for if_simloop().  one thing still unclear
	to me is, what can ip{,6}_mloopback() do about it? (I believe nothing
	they can do)

itojun


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message