Date: Wed, 31 May 2000 11:51:35 +0900 From: itojun@iijlab.net To: Archie Cobbs <archie@whistle.com> Cc: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: BPF fix to if_loop.c Message-ID: <5679.959741495@coconut.itojun.org> In-Reply-To: archie's message of Tue, 30 May 2000 18:19:27 MST. <200005310119.SAA86718@bubba.whistle.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>The commit comment to revision 1.33 of if_loop.c may be slightly >enlightening.. > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/sys/net/if_loop.c >For an example of the resulting cleanup, see: > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/sys/net/if_ethersubr.c.diff?r1=1.48&r2=1.49 >Maybe the caller of if_simloop() should be responsible for the BPF part.. that is my understanding for if_simloop(). one thing still unclear to me is, what can ip{,6}_mloopback() do about it? (I believe nothing they can do) itojun To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5679.959741495>