From owner-freebsd-hackers Wed Jan 29 18:03:15 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id SAA10266 for hackers-outgoing; Wed, 29 Jan 1997 18:03:15 -0800 (PST) Received: from cheops.anu.edu.au (avalon@cheops.anu.edu.au [150.203.76.24]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id SAA10250 for ; Wed, 29 Jan 1997 18:03:11 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <199701300203.SAA10250@freefall.freebsd.org> Received: by cheops.anu.edu.au (1.37.109.16/16.2) id AA021069778; Thu, 30 Jan 1997 13:02:58 +1100 From: Darren Reed Subject: Re: ipdivert & masqd To: cmott@srv.net (Charles Mott) Date: Thu, 30 Jan 1997 13:02:58 +1100 (EDT) Cc: hackers@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: from "Charles Mott" at Jan 29, 97 03:05:34 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23] Content-Type: text Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk In some mail from Charles Mott, sie said: > > > > That is curious. What does TIS FWTK/Gauntlet do? > > > > does a send/write call for "PORT " and another for the address/port > > info. > > > > Darren > > My syntax may have been a little unclear. It is just that I had never > heard of the TIS ... Gauntlet program. Is it just an FTP client, or > something more advanced? If source code is available, I think that some > may wish to update the code. Firewall product. The point is, it isn't Gauntlet or the Firewall Toolkit which is doing anything wrong, it is the "transparent proxy" which makes bad assumptions (although 99% of the time it gets away with them). Darren