Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2014 22:37:27 +0200 From: Tijl Coosemans <tijl@FreeBSD.org> To: Matthias Andree <mandree@FreeBSD.org> Cc: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r356542 - head/security/vuxml Message-ID: <20140604223727.5e63bb25@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> In-Reply-To: <201406042015.s54KF3C6093872@svn.freebsd.org> References: <201406042015.s54KF3C6093872@svn.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 4 Jun 2014 20:15:03 +0000 (UTC) Matthias Andree wrote: > Author: mandree > Date: Wed Jun 4 20:15:03 2014 > New Revision: 356542 > URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/356542 > QAT: https://qat.redports.org/buildarchive/r356542/ > > Log: > Fix extraneous <vuxml> open tag on line 88. > > Modified: > head/security/vuxml/vuln.xml > > Modified: head/security/vuxml/vuln.xml > ============================================================================== > --- head/security/vuxml/vuln.xml Wed Jun 4 20:08:15 2014 (r356541) > +++ head/security/vuxml/vuln.xml Wed Jun 4 20:15:03 2014 (r356542) > @@ -85,7 +85,6 @@ Notes: > </dates> > </vuln> > > -<vuxml xmlns="http://www.vuxml.org/apps/vuxml-1">; > <vuln vid="027af74d-eb56-11e3-9032-000c2980a9f3"> > <topic>gnutls -- client-side memory corruption</topic> > <affects> > Is it possible to merge the two gnutls entries (two top entries)? They cover exactly the same vulnerability?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20140604223727.5e63bb25>