From owner-freebsd-current Thu Apr 23 09:01:14 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id JAA24239 for freebsd-current-outgoing; Thu, 23 Apr 1998 09:01:14 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu (khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu [18.24.4.193]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id JAA24208 for ; Thu, 23 Apr 1998 09:01:10 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu) Received: (from wollman@localhost) by khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu (8.8.8/8.8.8) id MAA05522; Thu, 23 Apr 1998 12:00:59 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from wollman) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 1998 12:00:59 -0400 (EDT) From: Garrett Wollman Message-Id: <199804231600.MAA05522@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> To: darrenr@reed.wattle.id.au Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/netinet ip_fw.c In-Reply-To: <9804222327.AA01355@avalon.reed.wattle.id.au.> References: <19980422155133.57092@follo.net> <9804222327.AA01355@avalon.reed.wattle.id.au.> Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG < There are numerous programs like this already - ps, netstat, top, etc. > I'd say "deal with it". When I'm done with netstat, I hope to have its interface completely separated from the actual kernel internals. It's not there yet, but I think I have the right ideas on how to proceed. There's no reason why the same strategy can't be taken with the process table. -GAWollman -- Garrett A. Wollman | O Siem / We are all family / O Siem / We're all the same wollman@lcs.mit.edu | O Siem / The fires of freedom Opinions not those of| Dance in the burning flame MIT, LCS, CRS, or NSA| - Susan Aglukark and Chad Irschick To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message