Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2012 07:37:08 -0500 From: "b. f." <bf1783@googlemail.com> To: Pietro Cerutti <gahr@freebsd.org> Cc: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r307833 - head/x11-toolkits/fox16 Message-ID: <CAGFTUwOf%2BzsEP0jKBXfpgPMM0u1OwDNrA0pYJdqoZiTjJrQj9Q@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <201211271108.qARB8u5F050244@svn.freebsd.org> References: <201211271108.qARB8u5F050244@svn.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 11/27/12, Pietro Cerutti <gahr@freebsd.org> wrote: > Author: gahr > Date: Tue Nov 27 11:08:55 2012 > New Revision: 307833 > URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/307833 > > Log: > - Update to 1.6.47 > * Prototype of wndproc() was not correct for 64-bit Windows. > - Remove shlib versions from LIB_DEPENDS > > Feature safe: yes I'm confused: we have changes like this that clearly aren't feature safe going into the tree without explicit permission from portmgr, and Ken stating that the release was moving forward with only a limited set of packages. So is the ports tree still frozen, or not? b.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAGFTUwOf%2BzsEP0jKBXfpgPMM0u1OwDNrA0pYJdqoZiTjJrQj9Q>