From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 27 08:12:38 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FA6A16A41A for ; Sat, 27 Oct 2007 08:12:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from avg@icyb.net.ua) Received: from falcon.cybervisiontech.com (falcon.cybervisiontech.com [217.20.163.9]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F12C213C494 for ; Sat, 27 Oct 2007 08:12:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from avg@icyb.net.ua) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by falcon.cybervisiontech.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7411174400F; Sat, 27 Oct 2007 11:12:34 +0300 (EEST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at falcon.cybervisiontech.com Received: from falcon.cybervisiontech.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (falcon.cybervisiontech.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ghm7eFD3AnDp; Sat, 27 Oct 2007 11:12:34 +0300 (EEST) Received: from [10.2.1.87] (gateway.cybervisiontech.com.ua [88.81.251.18]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by falcon.cybervisiontech.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94B6774400E; Sat, 27 Oct 2007 11:12:26 +0300 (EEST) Message-ID: <4722F2E5.9020800@icyb.net.ua> Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2007 11:12:21 +0300 From: Andriy Gapon User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20070803) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, gnome@FreeBSD.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: avahi and avahi-autoipd X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2007 08:12:38 -0000 It seems that if net/avahi port is config-ed with WITH_AUTOIPD then there is a some sort of circular dependency between the two port which may affect some port management tools. avahi has a run dependency on avahi-autoipd and the latter has a build dependency on the former. I am not sure if this is legal from port infrastructure perspective but it is certainly troublesome for me personally. -- Andriy Gapon