From owner-freebsd-hackers Tue Apr 25 15:18:54 1995 Return-Path: hackers-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id PAA22207 for hackers-outgoing; Tue, 25 Apr 1995 15:18:54 -0700 Received: from silicon.csci.csusb.edu (silicon.csci.csusb.edu [139.182.38.1]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with SMTP id PAA22201 for ; Tue, 25 Apr 1995 15:18:52 -0700 Received: from orion.csci.csusb.edu by silicon.csci.csusb.edu (5.0/SMI-SVR4) id AA07690; Tue, 25 Apr 1995 15:23:45 +0800 Received: by orion.csci.csusb.edu (5.0/SMI-SVR4) id AA02079; Tue, 25 Apr 1995 15:18:11 +0800 Date: Tue, 25 Apr 1995 15:18:11 -0700 (PDT) From: Neal Westfall To: "Rashid Karimov." Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Latest SNAP - inst.problems (PCI/BT946c). In-Reply-To: <199504251919.PAA23326@haven.ios.com> Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Content-Length: 666 Sender: hackers-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Tue, 25 Apr 1995, Rashid Karimov. wrote: > Any clue ? Personally I think that latest SNAP ( 0412 ) have > much more problems with ( at least ) installation phase, than > one from February - looking at the letter we have here at > questions@ and hackers@ I agree with this, having just installed the 0412 snap. The system rebooted twice during the install after dropping to a shell, before I was finished configuring. I had to install src and X11 by running the extract scripts after the system came up multi-user. I will need to run it for awhile to determine how stable it is. One problem I am having is building X applications which use xpm. Neal