Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2001 22:42:56 +0300 From: Giorgos Keramidas <charon@labs.gr> To: Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai <asmodai@wxs.nl> Cc: arch@FreeBSD.org, Lyndon Nerenberg <lyndon@atg.aciworldwide.com> Subject: Re: your mail Message-ID: <20011027224256.A35705@hades.hell.gr> In-Reply-To: <20011027100907.U96876@daemon.ninth-circle.org> References: <200110250222.f9P2M30H071765@atg.aciworldwide.com> <20011026153313.C96876@daemon.ninth-circle.org> <20011026192933.B16134@hades.hell.gr> <20011027004636.C94651@dragon.nuxi.com> <20011027100907.U96876@daemon.ninth-circle.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Oct 27, 2001 at 10:09:07AM +0200, Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai wrote: > > >Please! No one has come close to suggesting 'cc' goes away as a command. > > Exactly. > > Only reason I uttered my idea of: > > cc -> gcc > > And have that behaviour under a knob is that when I install other C > compilers and they make a cc -> whatevercc in /usr/local/bin or > something it will pick that cc up without mangling PATH back and forth. > > Not a big deal if it's there or not, just eases work a bit. But this > knob would be on by default to make the symlinks. In that case, I stand corrected :) If the default will be to still make a link cc -> gcc (and all their friends, like c++, etc), then this does not soundn like a bad idea. Not bad at all. -giorgos To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20011027224256.A35705>