Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 22 Oct 2012 19:20:02 +0400
From:      "Alexander V. Chernikov" <melifaro@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Gleb Smirnoff <glebius@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        svn-src-head@FreeBSD.org, svn-src-all@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: svn commit: r241888 - in head: share/man/man9 sys/net
Message-ID:  <50856422.80702@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <20121022151716.GE70741@FreeBSD.org>
References:  <201210221410.q9MEAH9d025513@svn.freebsd.org> <20121022151716.GE70741@FreeBSD.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 22.10.2012 19:17, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 02:10:17PM +0000, Alexander V. Chernikov wrote:
> A> Author: melifaro
> A> Date: Mon Oct 22 14:10:17 2012
> A> New Revision: 241888
> A> URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/241888
> A>
> A> Log:
> A>   Make PFIL use per-VNET lock instead of per-AF lock. Since most used packet
> A>   filters (ipfw and PF) use the same ruleset with the same lock for both
> A>   AF_INET and AF_INET6 there is no need in more fine-grade locking.
> A>   However, it is possible to request personal lock by specifying
> A>   PFIL_FLAG_PRIVATE_LOCK flag in pfil_head structure (see pfil.9 for
> A>   more details).
> A>
> A>   Export PFIL lock via rw_lock(9)/rm_lock(9)-like API permitting pfil consumers
> A>   to use this lock instead of own lock. This help reducing locks on main
> A>   traffic path.
> A>
> A>   pfil_assert() is currently not implemented due to absense of rm_assert().
> A>   Waiting for some kind of r234648 to be merged in HEAD.
> A>
> A>   This change is part of bigger patch reducing routing locking.
> A>
> A>   Sponsored by:	Yandex LLC
> A>   Reviewed by:	glebius, ae
>
> I didn't review that, we have only discussed that.
Ah, ok.
So commit message should be read as s/Reviewed by:/Discussed with:/
>


-- 
WBR, Alexander





Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?50856422.80702>