From owner-freebsd-security  Sat Sep 27 20:14:48 1997
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-security>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id UAA02113
          for security-outgoing; Sat, 27 Sep 1997 20:14:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (root@time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id UAA02106
          for <freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG>; Sat, 27 Sep 1997 20:14:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (jkh@localhost.cdrom.com [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.8.7/8.6.9) with ESMTP id UAA27606; Sat, 27 Sep 1997 20:14:32 -0700 (PDT)
To: "Studded" <Studded@dal.net>
cc: "freebsd-security@freebsd.org" <freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject: Re: samba security fix going into 2.2.5? 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Sat, 27 Sep 1997 18:47:01 PDT."
             <199709280147.SAA03871@mail.san.rr.com> 
Date: Sat, 27 Sep 1997 20:14:32 -0700
Message-ID: <27603.875416472@time.cdrom.com>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> 	Actually my hope was that the people who do these kind of
> commits would be more proactive about posting these kinds of things. 

Nope.  You have to follow the commits if you really want to stay
on top of things - people are already overloaded as it is just
in trying to get things committed before they go stale.

						Jordan