Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2020 11:35:53 +0700 From: Victor Sudakov <vas@sibptus.ru> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Technological advantages over Linux Message-ID: <20200724043553.GA62650@admin.sibptus.ru> In-Reply-To: <bb4b45c49da2c1b3a4cb66512eb52b710c7d1da7.camel@adminart.net> References: <20200214121620.GA80657@admin.sibptus.ru> <20200724032840.GA61047@admin.sibptus.ru> <bb4b45c49da2c1b3a4cb66512eb52b710c7d1da7.camel@adminart.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--k+w/mQv8wyuph6w0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable hw wrote: > >=20 >=20 > You can add that NFS in FreeBSD is a catastrophy. Bascially, you can only > export whole file systems with permissions applying to the whole file > system, and that practically makes NFS unusable. That means >=20 >=20 > 9. very limited NFS support in FreeBSD >=20 >=20 My experience with NFS is rather limited. I use it to export filesystems r/o with ISO images, music and such, nothing sophisticated that would require granular permissions etc. > Besides this, setting up NFS in FreeBSD is the opposite of user friendly. Maybe ZFS+NFSv4 is better (did not try it myself though)? --=20 Victor Sudakov, VAS4-RIPE, VAS47-RIPN 2:5005/49@fidonet http://vas.tomsk.ru/ --k+w/mQv8wyuph6w0 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJfGmUpAAoJEA2k8lmbXsY0YzUIALIy62qfjQ1zGP9GoKSqxx86 6WT15mvaZCX1IMbSDd3wbnR9m3S+koA0d7x6X0sfLq/ovU/4LhdYym+Hx//4DQEf PhljlZyl5T+kzx1tccwWEsdw82sk9PPAdGK/2UXLtqTbFzhubOcB6wSQeIFJJaJf WaknwOyV+8fRwJkk6NZpzHkgo9ytLGKJbIbq7dagosX1lzR75xaewE7TdaKME943 lSd3fCC7IPzNmV75GuAaujAjO3HcZjxDjb0VLs7F6E2J/ltaPH489TVcTICPec5Q fkQJycRRQerMYf07FxIc4jpcWvvFSkeytBaqPy+TyhYBs03DK+QvVMZibL4CaG8= =YVvB -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --k+w/mQv8wyuph6w0--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20200724043553.GA62650>