From owner-freebsd-net Tue Apr 3 10:28: 0 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from peorth.iteration.net (peorth.iteration.net [208.190.180.178]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 404BF37B725 for ; Tue, 3 Apr 2001 10:27:57 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from keichii@peorth.iteration.net) Received: by peorth.iteration.net (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 6EB7559531; Tue, 3 Apr 2001 12:27:56 -0500 (CDT) Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2001 12:27:56 -0500 From: "Michael C . Wu" To: David Xu Cc: Jonathan Graehl , Freebsd-Net Subject: Re: Linux Vs. FreeBSD Networking Performance Message-ID: <20010403122756.A905@peorth.iteration.net> Reply-To: "Michael C . Wu" Mail-Followup-To: "Michael C . Wu" , David Xu , Jonathan Graehl , Freebsd-Net References: <01295542.20010323085541@21cn.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <01295542.20010323085541@21cn.com>; from bsddiy@21cn.com on Fri, Mar 23, 2001 at 08:55:41AM +0800 X-PGP-Fingerprint: 5025 F691 F943 8128 48A8 5025 77CE 29C5 8FA1 2E20 X-PGP-Key-ID: 0x8FA12E20 Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Fri, Mar 23, 2001 at 08:55:41AM +0800, David Xu scribbled: | Friday, March 23, 2001, 3:12:19 AM, you wrote: | JG> Interesting topic in the linux kernel mailing list (Linux is "a lot" faster than | JG> FreeBSD): | JG> http://kt.zork.net/kernel-traffic/latest.html#2 | | JG> I came to use FreeBSD from Linux for servers because of kqueue. I stayed | JG> because I liked the entire system. I'm sure that Linux does TCP processing as | JG> fast as possible, and that in-kernel servers (NFS and the TUX webserver) are | JG> blazingly fast. | | JG> I do have Linux 2.4 running on an old machine, but I have no intention of taking | JG> down my FreeBSD box to dual boot Linux just to compare penis size. Has anyone | JG> recently done so? | I can confirm Linux 2.4 TCP/IP is faster than FreeBSD, they have | dynamic tuned TCP window, unlike we have a fixed max TCP window | set in SYSCTL. they have SACK and FACK, it is better in high speed line | than FreeBSD, it is also multi-threaded, better on SMP, someone | despise Linux should wakeup now, Linux is not so bad. I can confirm the following: A) You are a troll. B) The above "confirmation" states nothing. You fail to state the conditions of the test. You do not qualify your statements with facts. C) Want me to show you where FreeBSD wins? Let's try 4700 simultaneous users, constant 500KB/s network output with 800KB/s bursts, I/O on vinum with stable 80MB/s. Linux 2.4 or 2.2.x never stood up to even just half that load. D) Your posts are very good flame baits because I am writing this email. Has it ever occurred to you that your opinions might be stupid and ignorant? Please refrain from posting dumb emails. -- +-----------------------------------------------------------+ | keichii@iteration.net | keichii@freebsd.org | | http://iteration.net/~keichii | Yes, BSD is a conspiracy. | +-----------------------------------------------------------+ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message