Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 5 Feb 2015 12:23:14 -0800
From:      hiren panchasara <hiren@strugglingcoder.info>
To:        Scott Long <scott4long@yahoo.com>
Cc:        FreeBSD Net <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: Silly experiments with netisr
Message-ID:  <20150205202314.GD69733@strugglingcoder.info>
In-Reply-To: <752D84FB-0B65-47CF-973A-91C3697A28DC@yahoo.com>
References:  <54D3BE67.8060502@ignoranthack.me> <752D84FB-0B65-47CF-973A-91C3697A28DC@yahoo.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--NklN7DEeGtkPCoo3
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On 02/05/15 at 12:31P, Scott Long via freebsd-net wrote:
>=20
> > On Feb 5, 2015, at 12:03 PM, Sean Bruno <sbruno@ignoranthack.me> wrote:
> >=20
> >=20
> > Signed PGP part
> > Some questions came up around the office and we ended up doing some
> > quite silly things with lo0 and netcat.
> >=20
> > If one runs a continuous netcat on localhost to another netcat listener
> > on localhost that writes the output to /dev/null, netisr gets super busy
> > doing stuff/things.
> >=20
> > E.g.
> >   -- listener running "nc -k -l 10000 > /dev/null"
> >   -  sender running in a while loop "nc -N localhost 10000 <
> > /var/tmp/testfile"
> >=20
> > Interesting things start happening on the machine.  top -SH shows netisr
> > eating up about 1/2 of a cpu core.  If you drop the MTU on lo0 to 1500
> > (so that it looks like something in the real world), netisr will peg out
> > a cpu core.  This seems logical, in that smaller MTU means busier
> > netisr.  Its interesting though.
> >=20
> > Looking at some pmcstat things, shows that the system is busilly
> > chugging along in tcp_do_segment().  I wonder if this is meaningful in
> > anyway or just "interesting".
>=20
>=20
> Welcome to our workload.  Granted, we don?t involve pf, but the majority =
of our CPU processing right now is spent in TCP (with the rest being spent =
in the VM, but that?s a different matter).
>=20
> FWIW, Randall has some optimizations in this area of the stack.  They are=
n?t huge, IIRC they?re only a few percent, but worth looking at.
Scott,

It'd be great if you guys can share it. And yes, any small persentage would
help :-)

cheers,
Hiren

--NklN7DEeGtkPCoo3
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (FreeBSD)
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=
=Nymf
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--NklN7DEeGtkPCoo3--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20150205202314.GD69733>