From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 15 03:10:22 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B568F37B401 for ; Tue, 15 Jul 2003 03:10:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57FAB43F75 for ; Tue, 15 Jul 2003 03:10:22 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h6FAAMUp084926 for ; Tue, 15 Jul 2003 03:10:22 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id h6FAAMhO084925; Tue, 15 Jul 2003 03:10:22 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2003 03:10:22 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200307151010.h6FAAMhO084925@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org From: Sergei Kolobov Subject: Re: ports/54473: port update: security/firewalk 1.0 -> 5.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Sergei Kolobov List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2003 10:10:23 -0000 The following reply was made to PR ports/54473; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Sergei Kolobov To: "Sergey A. Osokin" , Yonatan@xpert.com Cc: freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/54473: port update: security/firewalk 1.0 -> 5.0 Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2003 13:48:59 +0400 On 2003-07-14 at 08:26 -0700, Sergey A. Osokin wrote: > Synopsis: port update: security/firewalk 1.0 -> 5.0 > > AFAIK firewalk still depends from net/libnet-devel > and net/libdnet. Last is broken for FreeBSD, because > it do not support ipfw2. Any idea? FYI - I have submitted PRs to update net/libnet and net/libnet-devel to the latest versions: ports/54386 - update net/libnet to 1.1.0 ports/54421 - update net/libnet-devel to 1.1.1-RC-005 Since 1.1.0 is now a stable version, and since firewalk 5.0 needs at least that version, it may now depend on net/libnet (obviously, after committing 54386) instead of net/libnet-devel. As far as net/libdnet - yes, it is broken on 5.x. Nonetheless, it should be useable under 4.x. Sergei