From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Aug  6 09:41:23 2009
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACD78106564A
	for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Thu,  6 Aug 2009 09:41:22 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from patfbsd@davenulle.org)
Received: from smtp.lamaiziere.net (net.lamaiziere.net [91.121.44.19])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 711F18FC0A
	for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Thu,  6 Aug 2009 09:41:22 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from baby-jane.lamaiziere.net (81-65-128-47.rev.numericable.fr
	[81.65.128.47])
	by smtp.lamaiziere.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 6863A63317E;
	Thu,  6 Aug 2009 11:41:21 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from baby-jane.lamaiziere.net (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by baby-jane.lamaiziere.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CCF5C117;
	Thu,  6 Aug 2009 11:41:38 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2009 11:41:17 +0200
From: Patrick Lamaiziere <patfbsd@davenulle.org>
To: t_ziel <t_ziel@wp.pl>
Message-ID: <20090806114117.01e3bc4d@baby-jane.lamaiziere.net>
In-Reply-To: <4a79b851c35591.53590172@wp.pl>
References: <4a79900244e836.09814382@wp.pl>
	<20090805172512.0917a158@baby-jane.lamaiziere.net>
	<4a79b851c35591.53590172@wp.pl>
X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.2 (GTK+ 2.16.4; i386-portbld-freebsd8.0)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: freebsd-ports <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: Is somebody working on these ports? (libquantum, spark, eiffel)
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Aug 2009 09:41:23 -0000

Le Wed, 05 Aug 2009 18:50:25 +0200,
t_ziel <t_ziel@wp.pl> a =E9crit :

> The latest development snapshot is dated: 2009-01-13 so it's not too=20
> old, nor dead.
> http://gforge.inria.fr/frs/?group_id=3D184

Se 2 is mostly dead:
http://n2.nabble.com/Status-of-SmartEiffel-(alive-or-dead)-td3085602.html

> If SmartEiffel 2 is not compatible wit SmartEiffel 1, it's better to=20
> include all versions to let users decide what the want to install.

Yes, but how many people use SmartEiffel?

SE 1 is broken for a while on amd64 with gcc4, that's a known problem.
In fact, each time I tried to use this port, it appeared to be broken
in a way (does not fetch, does not build). If there are only two or
three users we should remove it from the ports tree, I think.