From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 25 11:26:34 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B333A106567A; Tue, 25 Oct 2011 11:26:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org) Received: from citadel.icyb.net.ua (citadel.icyb.net.ua [212.40.38.140]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D29178FC12; Tue, 25 Oct 2011 11:26:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from odyssey.starpoint.kiev.ua (alpha-e.starpoint.kiev.ua [212.40.38.101]) by citadel.icyb.net.ua (8.8.8p3/ICyb-2.3exp) with ESMTP id OAA12382; Tue, 25 Oct 2011 14:26:31 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org) Message-ID: <4EA69CE6.5070601@FreeBSD.org> Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2011 14:26:30 +0300 From: Andriy Gapon User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20111003 Thunderbird/7.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: John Baldwin References: <201110241133.23397.jhb@freebsd.org> <4EA59165.1000202@FreeBSD.org> <201110241423.44951.jhb@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <201110241423.44951.jhb@freebsd.org> X-Enigmail-Version: undefined Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Fresh installed Freebsd 9 don't boot from hd X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2011 11:26:34 -0000 on 24/10/2011 21:23 John Baldwin said the following: > On Monday, October 24, 2011 12:25:09 pm Andriy Gapon wrote: >> Also, perhaps edd_params_v3 and edd_params_v4 should inherit edd_params in some >> "smarter" way to avoid verbatim duplicates. > > Yeah, probably so. We will probably never even use them anyway (just as we don't > use edd_packet_v3 even though we could probably make use of it to avoid some > bounce buffering in the loader). > >> Other than these issues the patch looks great! >> Perhaps later we could do detailed definitions for things like interface paths for >> various cases, etc. > > I doubt we will ever use them. In theory we could pass that information from loader to kernel, so that in a booted system we could try to build a mapping between kernel disks and bios disks, with the boot disk potentially being of the most interest. -- Andriy Gapon