From owner-freebsd-questions Mon Feb 8 13:55:27 1999 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id NAA09923 for freebsd-questions-outgoing; Mon, 8 Feb 1999 13:55:27 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from quack.kfu.com (quack.kfu.com [170.1.70.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id NAA09918 for ; Mon, 8 Feb 1999 13:55:25 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from nsayer@medusa.kfu.com) Received: from medusa.kfu.com (medusa.kfu.com [170.1.70.5]) by quack.kfu.com (8.8.7/8.8.5) with ESMTP id NAA11666 for ; Mon, 8 Feb 1999 13:55:04 -0800 (PST) Received: (from nsayer@localhost) by medusa.kfu.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) id NAA00293 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 8 Feb 1999 13:55:03 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from nsayer) Date: Mon, 8 Feb 1999 13:55:03 -0800 (PST) From: Nick Sayer Message-Id: <199902082155.NAA00293@medusa.kfu.com> To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Fixed it Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I think I got filtered bridging to work correctly. It took a little bit of hacking on netinet/ip_fw.c (selective code import from -current) and net/bridge.c (basically a logic change in the call to ip_fw_chk - the dst parameter should be NULL rather than src). Does anyone care about 2.2.8 patches anymore? I could send in a patch if so. P.s. I also made appropriate patches to if_tx.c for bridging and could pass those along if desired. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message