From owner-freebsd-questions Thu Jun 20 06:53:22 1996 Return-Path: owner-questions Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id GAA13540 for questions-outgoing; Thu, 20 Jun 1996 06:53:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dyson.iquest.net (dyson.iquest.net [198.70.144.127]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id GAA13535 for ; Thu, 20 Jun 1996 06:53:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from root@localhost) by dyson.iquest.net (8.7.5/8.6.9) id IAA09327; Thu, 20 Jun 1996 08:52:50 -0500 (EST) From: "John S. Dyson" Message-Id: <199606201352.IAA09327@dyson.iquest.net> Subject: Re: JDK To: spfarrel@midway.uchicago.edu (steve farrell) Date: Thu, 20 Jun 1996 08:52:50 -0500 (EST) Cc: owensc@enc.edu, spfarrel@midway.uchicago.edu, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <199606201341.IAA24775@meno.uchicago.edu> from "steve farrell" at Jun 20, 96 08:41:56 am X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24 ME8] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-questions@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > > i think i'll write to the guy. his comments on that page are quite > revealing... that freebsd needs some more work to better handle the > threads. anyone have more info on this? (i have no idea what the > date is on that page, and things might have changed a lot.) > One thing that is on my list (and perhaps the next thing that I am going to do) is to support true sharing of address spaces between processes. That will allow better support of certain thread packages as I have heard. John