From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 10 16:21:12 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8930616A422 for ; Fri, 10 Feb 2006 16:21:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from brdavis@odin.ac.hmc.edu) Received: from odin.ac.hmc.edu (Odin.AC.HMC.Edu [134.173.32.75]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0831743D46 for ; Fri, 10 Feb 2006 16:21:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from brdavis@odin.ac.hmc.edu) Received: from odin.ac.hmc.edu (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by odin.ac.hmc.edu (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id k1AGLBfp013978; Fri, 10 Feb 2006 08:21:11 -0800 Received: (from brdavis@localhost) by odin.ac.hmc.edu (8.13.0/8.13.0/Submit) id k1AGLA4L013977; Fri, 10 Feb 2006 08:21:10 -0800 Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2006 08:21:10 -0800 From: Brooks Davis To: Alexander Leidinger Message-ID: <20060210162110.GA25430@odin.ac.hmc.edu> References: <20060210022408.GA21255@odin.ac.hmc.edu> <20060210142828.ynjvl9uu4ggogkkk@netchild.homeip.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="envbJBWh7q8WU6mo" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060210142828.ynjvl9uu4ggogkkk@netchild.homeip.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=8.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on odin.ac.hmc.edu Cc: Brooks Davis , ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: requirements for bsd.xxx.mk file X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2006 16:21:12 -0000 --envbJBWh7q8WU6mo Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Feb 10, 2006 at 02:28:28PM +0100, Alexander Leidinger wrote: > Brooks Davis wrote: >=20 > >I've been doing a deployment of drupal at work and I've ported a couple > >modules with plans to port more. I've built up a framework to make > >individual modules easy to port, but at the moment it's in the form of a > >Makefile and a pkg-install.in script that are mostly duplicated. I'm > >wondering what the bar is for creating a bsd.xxx.mk. How many ports are > >needed to justify the overhead? Should I use a >=20 > I think you need more than 2... :-) I figured. :-) > We have no rules here. So if you think for yourself the number of ports > reached the critical mass, just go ahead. >=20 > >${PORTSDIR}/www/drupal/Makefile.common instead like PEAR does? >=20 > IMHO the Makefile.common approach is a nice way to prototype/develop a fi= rst > working initial version. While a bsd.xxx.mk file is the "ok, we have > something to base our effort on, let's make it official" approach. Sounds good, I'll start with that. -- Brooks --=20 Any statement of the form "X is the one, true Y" is FALSE. PGP fingerprint 655D 519C 26A7 82E7 2529 9BF0 5D8E 8BE9 F238 1AD4 --envbJBWh7q8WU6mo Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFD7L11XY6L6fI4GtQRAlIWAKDZ4Ne8c06IHeE+bdAzojLstpJXFgCgxiyk rIzWzZFkTeriGA/cTgwMvqs= =be0j -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --envbJBWh7q8WU6mo--