From owner-svn-src-head@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 29 09:10:07 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-head@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E885106564A; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 09:10:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org) Received: from citadel.icyb.net.ua (citadel.icyb.net.ua [212.40.38.140]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16D838FC0C; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 09:10:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from porto.starpoint.kiev.ua (porto-e.starpoint.kiev.ua [212.40.38.100]) by citadel.icyb.net.ua (8.8.8p3/ICyb-2.3exp) with ESMTP id LAA13698; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 11:10:04 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) by porto.starpoint.kiev.ua with esmtp (Exim 4.34 (FreeBSD)) id 1S2fXw-0008pg-1b; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 11:10:04 +0200 Message-ID: <4F4DEB72.8050107@FreeBSD.org> Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 11:10:10 +0200 From: Andriy Gapon User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120218 Thunderbird/10.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tijl Coosemans References: <201202281815.q1SIFSbB082030@svn.freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <201202281815.q1SIFSbB082030@svn.freebsd.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3.5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: svn-src-head@FreeBSD.org, svn-src-all@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r232261 - in head/sys: amd64/include i386/include pc98/include x86/include X-BeenThere: svn-src-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the src tree for head/-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 09:10:07 -0000 on 28/02/2012 20:15 Tijl Coosemans said the following: > Author: tijl > Date: Tue Feb 28 18:15:28 2012 > New Revision: 232261 > URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/232261 > > Log: > Copy amd64 _types.h to x86 and merge with i386 _types.h. Replace existing > amd64/i386/pc98 _types.h with stubs. These header changes seem to be quite significant with potentially long-term consequences. If they have been thoroughly reviewed and discussed then it makes sense to not withhold at least "Reviewed by" line. -- Andriy Gapon