From owner-freebsd-current  Fri Jun 21 19:25:26 1996
Return-Path: owner-current
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id TAA19184
          for current-outgoing; Fri, 21 Jun 1996 19:25:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from parkplace.cet.co.jp (parkplace.cet.co.jp [202.32.64.1])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id TAA19179
          for <current@FreeBSD.ORG>; Fri, 21 Jun 1996 19:25:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (michaelh@localhost) by parkplace.cet.co.jp (8.7.5/CET-v2.1) with SMTP id LAA19392; Sat, 22 Jun 1996 11:25:05 +0900 (JST)
Date: Sat, 22 Jun 1996 11:25:04 +0900 (JST)
From: Michael Hancock <michaelh@cet.co.jp>
To: Jake Hamby <jehamby@lightside.com>
cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: The FreeBSD Way 
In-Reply-To: <Pine.AUX.3.91.960621170136.25817B-100000@covina.lightside.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.SV4.3.93.960622112318.19340A-100000@parkplace.cet.co.jp>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-current@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, 21 Jun 1996, Jake Hamby wrote:

> > >Hmm, I thought, that many sysadmin tools were written in tk...
> > >admintool, swmtool ... Am I so wrong ???
> > 
> > no, you are right.  Sun were one of the first companies to embrace
> > tcl/tk.  They even made an incredibly bogus openwin version of tk.
> 
> Whoa, Poul, I think you are wrong, at least as far as Solaris 2.5.  Maybe 
> originally they used TCL/Tk, but in Solaris 2.3, admintool was pure OPEN 

Maybe he's confusing Solaris with SCO.

-mike hancock